Why Do Online Pokies Have Higher RTP Than Pubs?

Last verified: 6 July 2026

Bottom line: Online pokies usually run a higher RTP than pub and club machines for three linked reasons: online operators carry far lower overheads, they compete much harder for players, and they are not bound by the lower RTP floors that Australian states set for venue machines. Online return to player commonly sits around 94 to 97 percent or higher, while many land-based venue machines are set toward the lower legal minimum. RTP is a long-run average, not a promise for your session, and the house edge still applies either way.

6 July 2026.

18+. Gamble responsibly. Gambling Help Online: 1800 858 858.

What RTP and the house edge actually mean

RTP, or return to player, is the share of all money wagered that a game is designed to pay back over the very long run. An RTP of 96 percent means that across millions of spins the game is built to return about A$96 for every A$100 staked, on average, with the missing portion being the house edge. The house edge is simply 100 percent minus the RTP - the operator's built-in margin. A 96 percent RTP game carries a 4 percent house edge.

The long run is the phrase that matters. RTP is an average measured over an enormous number of spins, not a rule for your afternoon, so a 96 percent game can take everything in a short session or hand someone a large win - both are normal inside the same average. A higher RTP tilts the long-run maths slightly in your favour, but it never removes the edge, and a few percentage points is not trivial: the gap between a 96 percent game and a lower-set venue machine widens the more you play. Over time the design still expects the house to keep its margin. Our guide on what RTP means works the numbers through in full, and the titles at the top of the range are collected on high-RTP pokies.

Reason 1: overheads and competition

Online operators run on a fraction of a venue's costs, and that saving can be pushed back into RTP. A pub or club pays for floor space, physical machines, power, staff, security and the venue itself, and every one of those costs has to come out of the machines' take. An online operator has none of the floor, so it can afford to return more of each dollar wagered and still run a business. Lower overhead leaves more room in the margin.

Competition is the second half of this reason. Online, an Australian can switch sites in seconds, so operators fight for players on the value they offer, and a stingy RTP is easy to leave behind. A venue faces far less of that pressure - the machines in front of you are the machines available - so there is less market force pushing venue RTP up. Online lobbies also publish RTP per title from many studios, so a low number is exposed for comparison rather than hidden inside a cabinet, which nudges the online figure higher still.

Reason 2: venue RTP floors are set lower

State and territory rules set a minimum RTP for land-based machines, and that floor is generally lower than what online games return. Gaming machines in Australian venues are regulated at the state and territory level, and each jurisdiction sets a legal minimum return that licensed venue machines must meet. Because that minimum is often below the 94 to 97 percent range common online, many venue machines are configured at or near the lower legal floor rather than up where competitive online games sit.

Offshore online operators are not bound by those state venue floors. The sites Australians reach are typically licensed offshore in Curacao or similar jurisdictions, outside the state gaming-machine framework, so their RTP is driven by market competition and studio defaults rather than a venue minimum. That is a large part of why the online figure trends higher - there is no low local floor pulling it down, and strong competition pulling it up. Consumer recourse offshore is weaker, though, which our brand reviews cover per site.

What a higher RTP does NOT promise

Frequently asked questions

Three reasons combine. Online operators carry far lower overheads than a venue, so they can return more per dollar; they compete hard for players who can switch sites instantly, which rewards a better return; and, being typically offshore-licensed, they are not held to the lower RTP floors that Australian states set for venue machines. Together these push online return to player commonly into the 94 to 97 percent range or higher.

As a general guide, many online pokies sit around 94 to 97 percent, and higher is better for the long-run maths. Remember RTP is an average over a very large number of spins, not a session guarantee, and the remaining percentage is the house edge the operator keeps. Confirm the RTP published for the specific game rather than assuming a number.

Not reliably. A higher RTP slightly improves the long-run return and reduces the house edge, but it says nothing about a single session, which can swing well above or below the average. The game is still designed for the house to keep its margin over time, so a higher RTP is a smaller disadvantage, not an advantage.

Partly cost and partly regulation. Venues carry heavy overheads that come out of the machines, and state and territory rules set a legal minimum RTP that is generally lower than competitive online levels, so many venue machines are configured near that floor. With less competitive pressure on a physical floor, there is little pushing the venue return upward.

Playing within limits

A higher RTP is still a losing proposition over time. The number describes how slowly the edge grinds, not whether you come out ahead, so treating a 96 percent game as a way to win money back is the wrong frame, and setting a budget matters more than chasing the best return figure.

Every operator we cover offers responsible-gambling tools: deposit limits, loss limits, session reminders, cooling-off periods and self-exclusion. Pick your spend before you play, and let a higher RTP be a small bonus, not a reason to play longer.

If you or someone you know needs support:

18+ only.


Reviewed by Jake Mitchell, Senior Pokies Reviewer. Fact-checked by Jacques Delmont, 6 July 2026. Disclosure: we earn a commission from some partner links on this page. Commissions do not affect our editorial position.

Last verified: 6 July 2026.